Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — |
wks_rubric [2019/08/13 20:49] (current) rachel created |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ~~NOTOC~~ | ||
| + | ===== Workshop In-Class Rubric ===== | ||
| + | The introductory workshops in DATA Lab are intended to set students up | ||
| + | for success during the semester and for PHY 252 DATA Lab. As such, this | ||
| + | rubric is intended to value the work they may do, the way they interact | ||
| + | in their groups, and how engaged they are in group or class discussions. | ||
| + | This may take the form of: | ||
| + | * Engaging with lab materials | ||
| + | * Actively participating in group discussions | ||
| + | * Presenting ideas to their group | ||
| + | * Critiquing the ideas other group members bring forth | ||
| + | * Communicating confusion or lack of understanding they encounter with their group/tutors | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is a non-exhaustive list. As long as they are actively | ||
| + | participating in the work being asked of them and are productively | ||
| + | communicating with their group and the class, the work should be valued. | ||
| + | For a more detailed list of what you will be graded on, see next page. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The notebooks will be collected at the end of each workshop day for | ||
| + | tutors to provide feedback on the student's documentation habits as well | ||
| + | as to assess the in class assignment they are asked to turn in each | ||
| + | day. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== General Grading Scale ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4.0 (96-100%) - Perfect, I can't think of anything they could have done better\\ | ||
| + | 3.75 (91-95%) - They were vital to their group's success but they could improve on some things\\ | ||
| + | 3.5 (87-90%) - They worked well with their group but there are definitely places where they can improve\\ | ||
| + | 3.25 (83-86%) - Sort of average, not outstanding but solid effort\\ | ||
| + | 3.0 (78-82%) - Weak participation, still worked with group but needs a lot of improvement\\ | ||
| + | 2.5 (68-74%) - Did not contribute in anyway to group's progress\\ | ||
| + | 2.0 (65-67%) - Negatively impacted work of group and progress on experiment\\ | ||
| + | 0.0 (0%) - Did not show up to class | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Learning Goals ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Group Function === | ||
| + | * Communication: Contribute to and remain involved in group discussions. | ||
| + | * Collaboration: Come prepared and work well with your group. | ||
| + | * Discussion: Work together to understand the result. | ||
| + | * Communication | ||
| + | * Engaged in group discussions | ||
| + | * Asking/answering questions | ||
| + | * Discussing plan with group | ||
| + | * Explaining equipment to each other | ||
| + | * Collaboration | ||
| + | * Come prepared | ||
| + | * Actively participate in group work | ||
| + | * Make sure everyone is on the same page | ||
| + | * Don't move on too quickly | ||
| + | * Try to come to consensus | ||
| + | * Ask for and give input | ||
| + | * Attempt to get everyone involved | ||
| + | * Don't dominate the discussion | ||
| + | * Discussion | ||
| + | * Work together to understand results | ||
| + | * Discuss implications of different experimental results or observations | ||
| + | * Contribute helpful ideas in data analysis | ||