184_projects:charge_the_line_24

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
184_projects:charge_the_line_24 [2024/01/09 15:05] – [Wrap Up Questions] dmcpadden184_projects:charge_the_line_24 [2024/01/09 15:09] (current) – [Wrap Up Questions] dmcpadden
Line 69: Line 69:
   - We assumed in this problem that the charge was divided equally among the spheres in our model. Is that a good assumption for conductors? Is that a good assumption for insulators? Why or why not?   - We assumed in this problem that the charge was divided equally among the spheres in our model. Is that a good assumption for conductors? Is that a good assumption for insulators? Why or why not?
   - If you change the radius for your observation points, what happens to your E-Field arrows? Is that expected? Why or why not?   - If you change the radius for your observation points, what happens to your E-Field arrows? Is that expected? Why or why not?
 +  - Is this how real lightning rods work (metal connected to an insulator)? Would the T be an effective lightning rod? Why or why not? (Feel free to google how lightning rods work!)
   - What are the limitations of this model? How could you improve your model?   - What are the limitations of this model? How could you improve your model?
  • 184_projects/charge_the_line_24.1704812707.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2024/01/09 15:05
  • by dmcpadden