This is an old revision of the document!
Magnetic Force between Two Current-Carrying Wires
Two parallel wires have currents in opposite directions, I1 and I2. They are situated a distance R from one another. What is the force per length L of one wire on the other?
Facts
- I1 and I2 exist in opposite directions.
- The two wires are separated by a distance R.
Lacking
- →FL
Approximations & Assumptions
- The currents are steady.
- The wires are infinitely long.
- There are no outside forces to consider.
Representations
- We represent the magnetic field from a very long wire as
→B=μ0I2πrˆz
- We represent the magnetic force on a little piece of current as
d→F=Id→l×→B
- We represent the situation with diagram below.
Solution
We know that the magnetic field at the location of Wire 2 from Wire 1 is given by the magnetic field of a long wire: →B=μ0I12πrˆz
We can reason that the direction of the field is +ˆz because of the Right Hand Rule. We also don't care about the magnetic field from Wire 2 at the location of Wire 2, since Wire 2 cannot exert a force on itself. Now, it remains to calculate the magnetic force.
Since we know the magnetic field, the next thing we wish to define is d→l. Wire 2 has current directed with ˆy in our representation, so we can say d→l=dyˆy
This gives d→l×→B=μ0I12πrdyˆx
Lastly, we need to choose the limits on our integral. We can select our origin conveniently so that the segment of interest extends from y=0 to y=L. Now, we write:
\frac{\vec{F}_{1 \rightarrow 2}}}{L} = \int_0^L I_2 \text{d}\vec{l} \times \vec{B} = \int_0^L \frac{\mu_0 I_1 I_2}{2 \pi r}\text{d}y \hat{x} = \frac{\mu_0 I_1 I_2 L}{2 \pi r} \hat{x}
For now, we write d→l=⟨dx,−dy,0⟩
We write the y-component with a negative sign so that dy can be positive. For the separation vector, we write →r=→robs−→rsource=⟨0,0,0⟩−⟨x,y,0⟩=⟨−x,−y,0⟩
Notice that we can rewrite y as y=−x−L. This equation comes from the equation for a straight line, y=mx+b, where the slope of the line (or wire in this case) is m=−1 and the y-intercept of the wire is at b=−L. An alternate solution to this example could also be to rotate the coordinate system so that the x or y axis lines up with wire. If finding y is troublesome, it may be helpful to rotate your coordinate axes.
We can use geometric arguments to say that dy=dx. See the diagram above for an insight into this geometric argument. We can now plug in to express d→l and →r in terms of x and dx: d→l=⟨dx,−dx,0⟩