Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
| 184_notes:examples:week12_flux_examples [2017/11/12 21:11] – [Review of Flux through a Loop] tallpaul | 184_notes:examples:week12_flux_examples [2018/08/09 18:08] (current) – curdemma | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[184_notes: | ||
| + | |||
| ===== Review of Flux through a Loop ===== | ===== Review of Flux through a Loop ===== | ||
| Suppose you have a magnetic field $\vec{B} = 0.6 \text{ mT } \hat{x}$. Three identical square loops with side lengths $L = 0.5 \text{ m}$ are situated as shown below. The perspective shows a side view of the square loops, so they appear very thin even though they are squares when viewed face on. | Suppose you have a magnetic field $\vec{B} = 0.6 \text{ mT } \hat{x}$. Three identical square loops with side lengths $L = 0.5 \text{ m}$ are situated as shown below. The perspective shows a side view of the square loops, so they appear very thin even though they are squares when viewed face on. | ||
| - | {{ 184_notes: | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
| ===Facts=== | ===Facts=== | ||
| Line 21: | Line 23: | ||
| * We represent the situation with the given representation in the example statement above. Below, we also show a side and front view of the first loop for clarity. | * We represent the situation with the given representation in the example statement above. Below, we also show a side and front view of the first loop for clarity. | ||
| - | {{ 184_notes: | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
| ====Solution==== | ====Solution==== | ||
| Since the magnetic field has a uniform direction, and the area of the loop is flat (meaning $\text{d}\vec{A}$ does not change direction either), then we can simplify the dot product: | Since the magnetic field has a uniform direction, and the area of the loop is flat (meaning $\text{d}\vec{A}$ does not change direction either), then we can simplify the dot product: | ||