184_notes:examples:week5_flux_two_radii

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
184_notes:examples:week5_flux_two_radii [2021/06/04 00:43] schram45184_notes:examples:week5_flux_two_radii [2021/06/04 00:47] (current) schram45
Line 22: Line 22:
 <WRAP TIP> <WRAP TIP>
 ===Approximations & Assumptions=== ===Approximations & Assumptions===
 +There are a few approximations and assumptions we should make in order to simplify our model.
   * There are no other charges that contribute appreciably to the flux calculation.   * There are no other charges that contribute appreciably to the flux calculation.
   * There is no background electric field.   * There is no background electric field.
   * The electric fluxes through the spherical shells are due only to the point charge.   * The electric fluxes through the spherical shells are due only to the point charge.
-  * Perfect spheres. +The first three assumptions ensure that there is nothing else contributing or affecting the flux through our spheres in the model. 
-  * Constant charge for the point charge (no charging/discharging).+  * Perfect spheres: This will simplify our area vectors and allows us to use geometric equations for spheres in our calculations
 +  * Constant charge for the point charge: Ensures that the point charge is not charging or discharging with time.
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
  • 184_notes/examples/week5_flux_two_radii.1622767420.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2021/06/04 00:43
  • by schram45