184_notes:examples:week9_detecting_b

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
184_notes:examples:week9_detecting_b [2021/07/01 15:12] schram45184_notes:examples:week9_detecting_b [2021/07/05 21:58] (current) – [Solution] schram45
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 ===Approximations & Assumptions=== ===Approximations & Assumptions===
-  * The particle can be treated as a point particle.. +  * We are only interested in the $B$-field at this specific moment in time: As the particle moves some its parameters may change (i.e. velocity, charge...). This assumption gives use fixed variables to work with at this snapshot in time, simplifying down the complexity of the model
-  * We are only interested in the $B$-field at this specific moment in time.+
  
 ===Representations=== ===Representations===
Line 59: Line 58:
 \vec{B}_3 &= \frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi}\frac{q\vec{v}\times \vec{r}_3}{{r_3}^3} = 4.2 \text{ nT } \hat{z} \vec{B}_3 &= \frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi}\frac{q\vec{v}\times \vec{r}_3}{{r_3}^3} = 4.2 \text{ nT } \hat{z}
 \end{align*} \end{align*}
 +
 +Observation location 3 is the furthest away from our moving point charge and we would expect it to have a smaller magnetic field than location 2, this is reflected in our solution. We also expected the magnetic field at location 1 to be 0 since the velocity and separation vector are parallel for this point (this is always a good thing to look for when approaching a problem with cross products).
  • 184_notes/examples/week9_detecting_b.1625152370.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2021/07/01 15:12
  • by schram45