Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 184_notes:gauss_motive [2017/07/08 20:14] – [Conceptualizing Gauss's Law around a Point Charge] caballero
+++ 184_notes:gauss_motive [2020/08/24 13:42] (current) – dmcpadden
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+/*[[184_notes:e_flux|Next Page: Electric Flux and Area Vectors]]*/
 ===== Motivation for Gauss's Law =====
+Last week, we learned about Ampere's Law, which was a cool shortcut for finding magnetic fields in highly symmetric situations. This week we will talk about a similar short for finding electric fields in symmetric situations, called Gauss's Law. While Gauss's Law has many similar features to Ampere's Law, there are a couple of key differences. First, we will be talking about enclosing a charge, rather than a current (since we are returning to a discussion about electric fields). Second, rather than talking about the magnetic field around an imagined loop, we will be talking about the electric field around an imagined area. The notes this week will step through each of the pieces of Gauss's Law, starting with introducing the general concept of Gauss's law before we talk about the mathematics and the advantages and disadvantages to using it.
-We have been analyzing the kinds of electric fields that are produced by charges. We started by finding the [[184_notes:pc_efield|electric field of a point charge]] and then used the electric field from a point charge to build up the [[184_notes:linecharge|electric field from a line of charge]]. The method of building a field from a point charge can also be used for a 2D sheet of charge or a 3D volume of charge and will //always// work; however, the mathematical calculation needed to determine the field can become much more complicated (you have to use either a double or triple integral). In some cases, we can use the symmetric nature of the situation to apply Gauss's Law as a shortcut for finding the electric field, even though there are trade offs for using this shortcut (it is alway true, but only useful in highly symmetric situations). In the end, both of these methods can tell us the same thing, even though the mathematics we will use is different: **charges create electric fields**. These notes will introduce the general concept of Gauss's law before we talk about the mathematics and the advantages and disadvantages to using it.
+{{youtube>_oktQiCNfEw?large}}
 ==== Conceptualizing Gauss's Law around a Point Charge ====
 {{ 184_notes:smallsphere.jpg?300}}
+Back at the beginning of the semester, we talked about how to find the electric field from [[184_notes:pc_efield|point charges]], [[184_notes:line_fields|lines of charge]], and [[184_notes:dist_charges|distributions of charge]] (i.e., cylinders, spheres, or planes of charge). The method of building a field from a point charge can also be used for a 2D sheet of charge or a 3D volume of charge and will //always// work; however, the mathematical calculation needed to determine the field can become much more complicated (you have to use either a double or triple integral). In some of these cases, Gauss's Law works as a shortcut for finding the electric field from complicated charge distributions. However, there are trade offs for using this shortcut -- it is always true, but only useful in highly symmetric situations. In the end, both of these methods are built around the same idea, even though the mathematics we will use is different: **charges create electric fields**.
 First, let's go back to our example of the point charge. [[184_notes:pc_efield#Electric_Field_Vectors|The electric field points away from a positive charge]]. If we imagine a spherical bubble (like a very thin shell) around the point charge, we could think about the strength of the electric field that is on the surface of our imagined bubble (shown in the figure to the right).
@@ Line 12: / Line 17: @@
   - The area of the imagined bubble or imagined Gaussian surface increases. The increase in area is proportional to $r^2$ because the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphere#Surface_area|surface area of a sphere]] is $A=4\pi r^2$.
-This suggests that the electric field at the surface of the imaginary sphere multiplied the surface area of the imaginary sphere is a constant. The idea of electric field at the surface of an area is called [[
+This suggests that //the electric field at the surface of the imaginary sphere multiplied by the surface area of the imaginary sphere is a constant//; this product is called [[
-_notes:e_flux|**electric flux**]]. If you draw the Gaussian surface with a larger radius, the electric field will be smaller, so the electric flux is constant. If you draw the Gaussian surface with a smaller radius, the electric field will be greater, so the electric flux is constant.
+_notes:e_flux|electric flux]].
+If we are considering a closed surface, like a bubble that encapsulates a charge, we are dealing with the total electric flux. If you draw the Gaussian surface with a larger radius, the electric field will be smaller, but the total electric flux is constant. If you draw the Gaussian surface with a smaller radius, the electric field will be greater, but the total electric flux is constant.
 {{  184_notes:bigsphere.jpg?300}}
-Gauss's Law is built around this idea that the electric flux is constant through the imagined bubble (no matter where we draw the surface of the bubble) and says that electric flux must be related to the amount of charge **//inside//** the bubble (the point charge in this case). //__Note that the Gaussian surface is completely imaginary__// - we are not physically placing some bubble around the charge. As we will talk about later, the choice of where to draw the surface and what shape to draw it is up to you; however, certain choices will lead to math that is virtually impossible, so we will want to be smart in our choice of surface.
+**Gauss's Law is built around this idea that the total electric flux is constant through the imagined bubble (no matter where we draw the surface of the bubble)** and that electric flux is related to the amount of charge **//inside//** the bubble (the point charge in this case). It turns out this relationship is always true - for any shape of charge (line, sphere, blob, etc.) and for any closed Gaussian surface, the electric flux on that surface is directly related to the charge inside the surface. Mathematically, we will write this idea behind Gauss's law as:
+$$\Phi_{tot}=\int \vec{E} \bullet \vec{dA}=\frac{Q_{enclosed}}{\epsilon_0}$$
+Where $\Phi_{tot}$ is the total electric flux through the Gaussian surface (which is calculated from the electric field $\vec{E}$ along the surface area of the Gaussian surface $d\vec{A}$) and $Q_{enclosed}$ is the amount of charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface. $\epsilon_0$ is the same constant that we used in the beginning of class: $8.85*10^{-12}\frac{C^2}{Nm^2}$.
-It turns out this relationship is always true - for any shape of charge (line, sphere, blob, etc.) and for any closed Gaussian surface, the electric flux on that surface is directly related to the charge **inside** the surface. We will spend use the next few pages of notes talking about the mathematical formalism for Gauss's Law, but this is the general conceptual idea behind the math.
+//__Note that the Gaussian surface is completely imaginary__//, just like the Amperian Loop - we are not physically placing some surface around the charge. As we will talk about later, the choice of where to draw the surface and what shape to draw it is up to you; however, certain choices will lead to math that is virtually impossible, so we will want to be careful in our choice of surface. We will spend the next few pages of notes talking about each of the pieces of Gauss's Law, but this is the general conceptual idea behind the math.